 |
I
first heard the New Jersey Symphony
by accident, three years ago, on public TV. I hadn't known, back then, how
powerful -- incandescent -- the orchestra could be, or that it was
emerging as a model of enlightened management. I was only flipping
channels on a quiet New Year's Eve and found myself arrested by a telecast
of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony. I didn't recognize the glowing concert hall
or the intense -- sometimes even feverish -- conductor, but the
performance couldn't have been more gripping, and I stayed with it, rapt,
until the end. This, as I learned at the end of the telecast, was the New
Jersey Symphony. The conductor was its music director, Zdenek Macal; the
hall was the then brand-new New Jersey Performing Arts Center (NJPAC),
built in Newark with hope that it might help reawaken that famously
troubled city. And all this surprised me, because when I'd last heard of
it, the Symphony was a gritty touring group that nobody outside New Jersey
ever wanted to talk about.
Was it always this good? I wanted to know, so I traveled to Newark to
hear more live, first at a Brahms festival at NJPAC, later at a
performance of the Mahler Third Symphony, then this year at a concert of
Asian music and at a Tchaikovsky festival, where a performance of
"Francesca da Rimini" made me smile with delight -- everything,
from the hush of the clarinet solo at the start of the love scene to the
wild despair of the start and conclusion, fell perfectly in place -- and
moved me very deeply. Sometimes Mr. Macal seems merely quite good, but
when he's inspired, this orchestra can soar.

Ten years ago, though, the New Jersey Symphony wasn't only gritty; it
was in serious trouble, with enormous debt and an impractical schedule,
which took it around the state to regular stops at 11 venues. The
musicians' lives were "pretty grueling," says principal
bassoonist Robert Wagner, who as head of the orchestra committee is the
musicians' leader. "There was never any sense of an occasion,"
says Karen Swanson, the symphony's former general manager and now director
of development. Home base, of sorts, was Newark's Symphony Hall, but this
was a home as needy, sometimes, as the city around it. Philip Thomas, the
orchestra's finance director, says (with a kind of relaxed relief,
grateful that these things don't happen any more): "I remember paying
the heating bill for them so we could play there that night."
Soon financial disaster hit, and the board wanted to cut the musicians'
pay. The musicians were furious, but one board member, Victor Parsonnet, a
Newark cardiac surgeon, responded to their angry protests, and when he
became board chairman in 1991, things looked up. "I won't take
credit," he says, with utter modesty, though his leadership seems to
illustrate a simple, though often forgotten, truth: If you treat people
generously, life can be better. "I'm immensely fond of the
musicians," he told me, apologizing, just in case this sounded
"trite" (though really, in the often warlike climate of American
orchestras, it sounded revolutionary). "I really love a lot of
them."

Dr. Parsonnet does take credit for being at least the "final
catalyst" in luring Mr. Macal -- a stronger music director, by far,
than anyone the orchestra ever had -- to New Jersey. And the picture --
or, better, the team that could restore the picture -- was completed when
Lawrence Tamburri came from the Richmond (Virginia) Symphony to become
executive director. Mr. Tamburri impressed me with his own modesty, along
with good spirits and decisive views of many issues in the orchestral
world, which he always backs with solid data. But his greatest
contribution to the restoration may have been what Maria Araujo, the
director of education and outreach, calls his ability to find
"win-wins," solutions which are good for everybody.
Not that business developments weren't important. The symphony's new
leadership persuaded the New Jersey legislature to vote a crucial $3
million grant, which all but wiped out the orchestra's debt (in return for
a promise, which the symphony kept, to balance its budget). The plans to
build NJPAC gave a focus to the future -- every concert there really would
be an occasion, and the symphony would also be part of Newark's revival.
Travel was reduced from 11 venues to seven, which still can be a scramble
to organize -- it's like "a massive game of 52 Pickup," says Ms.
Swanson -- but at least it's manageable.

And yet it's the human and artistic improvements that stand out most.
Mr. Macal, in his dizzy Czech English, says he told the orchestra, "I
can make, if you allow me, miracle with you." The musicians
responded, so eagerly that, when I talked to four of them, they cheerfully
refused even to listen when I said their conductor might not always reach
his fiery best.
The staff, too, seems happy and, if not quite relaxed -- there's too
much to do -- gets so aroused by its many challenges (how, for instance,
do you organize not just one volunteer group in your home town, but seven,
one for each regular venue?) that it may not even think of relaxing. The
staffers I met seem to love the symphony's annual festivals, like the
Brahms and Tchaikovsky events, planned with the help of Joseph Horowitz,
an activist scholar who's widely hired as a consultant to help orchestras
develop programming themes. "It's an artistic high point," says
the current General Manager Susan S. Stucker, a chance for even the
symphony's administrators to concentrate on music. The musicians love the
festivals, too. "You learn to understand so much more about the
composer's style," says cellist Frances E. Rowell. "The level of
the orchestra jumps up," says the concertmaster, Eric Wyrick,
something the "Francesca" performance I heard, at the end of the
Tchaikovsky festival, bears out. ("Thirty years I am thinking what to
do with this piece," said Mr. Macal to me, highlighting one impulsive
but savvy detail that helped make the performance vivid and unpredictable:
"I fluctuate all the time the tempo without knowing it.")
The musicians also benefit from unique initiatives, among them the
chance to apply for personal development grants, one of which gave a
grateful violinist, Kelly Hall-Tompkins, a chance to study the German
musical tradition with the past and present concertmasters of the Berlin
Philharmonic. When the New Jersey Symphony started these, no other
American orchestra offered anything like them, and the atmosphere they
helped create led, in 1999, to contract negotiations so friendly that they
sound like something out of a New Age management book. Representatives of
management and the musicians sat in a circle, with no lawyers present,
alternating places so they wouldn't square off as two separate sides.
First they talked about long-term goals, and only at the end did they
mention money.

This helps explain why the New Jersey Symphony became a model for other
orchestras, and praise for it flows freely, even from much larger
institutions. Henry Fogel, the executive director of the Chicago Symphony,
was happy to tell me that "this is one of the best-managed orchestras
in the country," and his words were amplified by John Gidwitz,
president of the Baltimore Symphony, who specifically cites New Jersey as
an example others might follow.
But what's going to happen in the future? Mr. Macal is leaving, and
it's not hard to guess that he thinks he's taken the symphony as far as it
can go without further changes. The musicians are passionate, but when
they played Mahler's huge and complex Sixth Symphony this year, I heard
them stretch beyond their limits; this is a piece that exposes every
section of an orchestra, and some weren't up to the standard set by that
spectacular Beethoven Ninth. To fix that, the symphony would have to pay
higher salaries, and perhaps expand its season, so it can offer musicians
year-round work, as most major American orchestras do. But where and with
what funding could it give 52 weeks of concerts? Which isn't to say that
serving its community in the ways it does now isn't worthy. But the
symphony does have some interesting new challenges to face.
Wall Street Journal, June
19, 2001
|