 |
New York
I admit I was skeptical.
Nor was I alone. To many of us in the classical
music world, the conjunction of diva-to-the-max Jessye Norman and the irrepressible
choreographer Bill T. Jones didnt seem promising, even with the imprimatur of
Lincoln Center, which produced their dual creation under the jittery title "How! Do!
We! Do!"
That Ms. Norman is, or was, a vocal phenomenon
cant be disputed. But, as a friend once said to me, "She doesnt
move!" Shes a large woman with an imperial presence, who, perhaps for reasons
both of heft and hauteur, appears to favor immobility. Even her singing itself can be
immobile. I heard her last in Mahiers "Das Lied von der Erde" with the
Boston Symphony, and she turned that profound and aching score into an exercise in vocal
production, a series of disconnected notes held out for inspection like intimidating
jewels, divorced from any musical or expressive purpose.

But now its time for me to summon all the crows in New York City,
and eat them, one by one. Because I was wrong about Ms. Norman, wrong about the
collaboration, and wronger still about Lincoln Centers smarts in bringing this odd
African-American pair together in a series called "New Visions," which is meant
to wake classical music up, by bouncing it against the more sharply contemporary fervor of
other kinds of art.
And something like that really did happen here,
though it was Ms. Norman, a classical musician, who got stretched, rather than classical
music itself. For a start, she did move. In fact, she and Mr. Jones (old friends, it turns
out, whove wanted to do something like this for quite a while) moved together in the
cool abstract space of the set theyd had designed. That was brave of her. When Mr.
Jones makes any gesture -- when he takes a step, stretches out his arm or turns his head
-- he inhabits it, making it speak. Next to him, Ms. Norman looked hesitant. But then most
of us would, and Ms. Norman -- blessedly unselfconscious -- was worth watching simply for
her apparent delight at the chance to try something new.
The evening was a disjointed anthology, one thing
after another, including song, dance, and also Frank OHaras poetry, which Mr.
Jones and Ms. Norman spoke as a charmingly bewildering dialogue. What this all was
supposed to add up to is beyond me, and maybe beside the point, since every moment was at
least interesting. Ms. Normans classical singing -- starting with a strained, and
out-of-tune performance of Berliozs "Spectre de Ia Rose" (from his cycle
of songs with orchestra, Les Nuits dété") -- wasnt pleasant But
since her classical performance hasnt been reliable for a while now, one key
question was what other kind of singing she could do. She answered that triumphantly with
"Les mots damour" (one of Edith Piafs trademark cabaret songs); with
some regal gospel howls, which were as far from classical music as anyone can get; and
finally with two songs by Duke Ellington. In one of them, "Dont Get Around Much
Anymore," she strolled elegantly in formal dress with Mr. Jones, sounding like the
queen of Tin Pan Alley pop. Who knew she could do that?

Which left just one thread dangling. Could any of Ms. Normans
impressive new energy revitalize her classical work? Since her last selection,
Schuberts "Gretchen am Spinnrade," was classical, Id hoped it would
provide an answer, but due to a staging miscalculation, it didnt. Ms. Norman sang it
at the back of the stage, behind a scrim, moving slowly from right to left as if
shed been possessed by Robert Wilson (whose trademark as a theatrical creator is
long, slow movement). Meanwhile her piano accompaniment thundered from an orchestra pit. I
could barely hear her, and so, for my purposes, at least, the evening ended
inconclusively.
The rest of the Lincoln
Center "New Visions" experiment spread throughout the past season seemed equally
inconclusive (even if Mr. Jones and Ms. Norman brought it to a happy close). One earlier
installment, Benjamin Bagbys recitation of "Beowuif" in the original Old
English, was fun -- "Hrrrufff!" (or something like that) Mr. Bagby roared, and
we were his for as long as the novelty lasted -- but had nothing to do with classical
music.
"Moondrunk," which
opened the series, featured Schoenbergs "Pierrot Lunaire," a clutch of
delicate and frenzied half-moaned songs with chamber-ensemble accompaniment, and suffered
because the music was paired with uncentered choreography by John Kelly. Mr. Kelly, says
piamst Sarah Rothenberg (who conceived the evening and co-produced it with her Da Camera
group in Houston) was the perfect partner, because hed done a dance-theater piece
based on the expressionist art of Egon Schiele, whose dark erotic pictures. come out of
much the same artistic world as "Pierrot." The problem, though, was that Mr.
Kelly didnt seem to notice Schoenbergs precision. "Pierrot Lunaire"
has countless centers, a new one every second or so, and Mr. Kellys dances, unfoldmg
with casual stylized abandon, distracted me from listening.
Weakest of all was
"Kindertotenlieder," a play built around Mahiers song cycle about the
death of children. Here was an evening inept in nearly every way, despite the fame of its
Canadian director, Robert Lepage. Were shown a woman who lost a child, and is
rehearsing Mahlers songs. The dialogue was scanty mundane, but even if it
hadnt been, the concept wouldnt work unless the musical performance was
devastating. And in the hands (or throat) of Rebecca Blankenship it was anything but that;
nor could she act her spoken lines.

Still, Im hopeful. These productions were experiments.
Theyre allowed to fail. But they should at least happen. One part of the series --
Bach cantatas staged and sung by the incendiary team of director Peter Sellars and
mezzo-soprano Lorraine Hunt -- had to be cancelled, and surely would have raised the level
of the whole.
And the concept itself is
welcome. "Whats important is that this is totally new territory," says
Jane Moss, vice president for programming at Lincoln Center, who has produced theater at
Center Stage in Baltimore, and at Playwrights Horizons in New York. "You need to get
it out there and look at it, and then you can see how to proceed." There are some
tricky elements, obviously -- casting has to be exactly right, and its hard to get
both theater and dance people, whose schedules are relatively simple, on the same program
as classical musicians, who tend to be booked years in advance.
But one success of "New Visions," Ms.
Moss says, was that "you did get audiences that dont usually listen to
classical music." I saw that myself. Critics at the "Moondrunk" opening
came from a cross-section of the arts, and the crowd at "How! Do! We! Do!"
helped the show earn its exclamation points. It was an excited meld of black people and
white, spilling into the street, needing only searchlights to make the evening seem like a
Hollywood premiere.
Classical music, which so rarely makes any impact
outside its own constricted world, needs that kind of excitement -- based, let me stress,
on artistic interest, not mere celebrity. And it was because of artistry that "How!
Do! We! Do!" succeeded -- it woke up a classical music superstar, taking her
somewhere shed never been.
"Moondrunk," by comparison, would only
have been mildly interesting even if it worked, because all it could have done (from a
classical musk perspective, anyway) was teach us things about Schoenberg. For that, we
could read a book. To interest people outside the classical music world -- and to take
hardened insiders somewhere really new -- we need events that feel different, events that transform the musicians themselves.
[One thing I didn't know when I wrote this -- that Jessye Norman
worked with Robert Wilson, and feels that she learned a lot about movement from him.]
Wall Street Journal, June 24, 1999
|