|
We're at Carnegie Hall, and there's a concert going on. As we sit
listening, our hearts beat and we breathe; our thoughts rustle and shout. If we were
hearing Beethoven, we could map his music to our heartbeat. But tonight the music is by
Luciano Berio, the great, fierce, cerebral modernist from Italy. How can we connect to
that?
There's a reasonable essay on Mr.
Berio in the program book, but the notes for his music won't help us much. "In early
years," one of them begins, "Luciano Berio assimilated both Ghedini's broadly
historical neo-classic inventiveness and Dallapiccola's lyrical serialism." The
writer is talking to himself, reciting distant names, Dallapiccola's known only to
connoisseurs, Ghedini's known to hardly anyone.
Nor can the bewildered, sweetly
modest gentleman who gave a talk before the concert help us. Mr. Berio's
"Alternatim," which is on this program, is a concerto of sorts for clarinet,
viola and chamber orchestra. In past centuries, the speaker declares, concertos were
easier to write, because "the soloists and orchestra could say the same thing."
But today, he insists, "there is no longer a way to establish homogeneity of
meaning." He never says why.
And Mr. Berio himself can't help us.
He gave a press conference the afternoon before the concert and was asked about the texts
he sets to music. In the past, they've been by major modern literary figures, but his
"Ofanim," which we're also hearing, uses words from the Bible. Why the change?
"I am not a religious man, but the Bible inhabits us," Mr. Berio murmured,
barely audible, and in any case evading the question with a wry turn of phrase. Surely we
needed to know how he thinks the Bible inhabits our culture, and, most of all,
how it inhabits him.
The concert began with "Serenata per un satellite," a diversion by the late
Bruno Maderna, Mr. Berio's friend and fellow modernist. And if it seems odd that an atonal
modernist work could be diverting, maybe we need to revise our thoughts about modernists.
Their hearts beat, too, and there's no reason they can't be amusing. Maderna compiled an
assortment of musical fragments for an orchestra to play, more or less ad lib, guided only
by a conductor -- Mr. Berio, this evening -- who signals when each musician should begin.
We could smile at the results, and say they're close to what we'd get if Maderna had
written his piece the normal way and now we were hearing the musicians practicing their
parts at random, while the orchestra warmed up. But Maderna was smarter than that, and the
"Serenata" had a distinct, twittering charm, clearly due to delighted musical
planning. In a more thoughtful world, maybe we'd hear music like this at pops concerts.
Once "Alternatim" began,
all analysis seemed beside the point. The clarinet and viola seesawed on a random breeze,
the musical balance tilting first toward one, then to the other. Mr. Berio has the
traditional Italian gift for melody, and this opening duet was simply irresistible, though
of course the melodies were freely sculpted, hardly traditional either in their harmony or
in their elusive rhythm.
But then anyone familiar with
contemporary life is used to things -- movies, art, relationships -- whose meaning can't
quite be pinned down. And in fact the difficulty of Mr. Berio's music has been wildly
exaggerated. Anyone who looks at abstract painting should be able to follow it. When you
look at a canvas by Mark Rothko (to pick a painter nearly at random) you don't expect to
see a portrait or a landscape. Instead you see darkened shapes, contrasts of subdued
colors, edges that are vague and soft; you feel, perhaps, a sense of deep emotion,
unspecified and tentative, but unmistakable.
In a Cy Twombly drawing, you see
squiggles; in Jackson Pollock, a riot of curves and splatters. Why, then, should you have
any problem noticing -- in "Alternatim" -- the easy sliding of the soloists,
massed clouds of sound from the orchestra, abrupt jagged leaps of melody, sudden
hesitations, or places where the music swirls around a single note? All you have to do is
listen -- take nothing for granted and accept what your ears are telling you.
If the music didn't change enough,
the fault was Mr. Berio's, but as conductor, not composer. Standing before the O.R.T.
Orchestra della Toscana, his gestures were rhythmically precise, but never varied. The
musicians, watching him, were left on their own to find variety of touch and tone.

This didn't hurt "Ofanim" as much. (Though Mr. Berio's bad conducting is
notorious; why does he persist?) "Ofanim" -- impressively scored for double
boys' choir, two groups of instrumentalists, and a female vocal soloist who rose like a
ghost from the shadows of her crumpled robes -- digs very deep. The children's voices
sounded innocent and distant (bravo to the American Boychoir for its performance), while
the instruments suggested currents in the earth below. Variety of detail didn't matter as
it did in "Alternatim," because the music coalesced into blocks, slabs,
batholiths of sound, which hovered timelessly, turning instrumental gestures into ripples
on the surface of the stone.
The singer, mezzo-soprano Esti Kenan
Ofri, with a voice too roughly textured to be fully classical, was like a synthesis of
rock and flesh, a presence both sensual and prehistoric. "Every motion is
arrested," wrote Mr. Berio, quoted in the program notes, which finally drew blood.
"Every light is extinguished. The scented orchard gives way to a withered vineyard,
and the image of the Mother, uprooted from her land and cast down to a 'dry and thirsty
ground,' evokes the memory of all the mothers of our time, of all the exiles and the
havocs that have left deep wounds in our conscience."
It's time to stop talking of such
works -- as the speaker before the concert did, along with most of the written commentary
-- as if they're nothing but experiments in musical language. Those experiments were made,
were welcome in the generation after World War II, and are largely over. Mr. Berio, now
72, is no longer in the avant-garde; for current relevance (even though
"Alternatim" and "Ofanim" were both premiered this year), he's been
superseded by a range of simpler, more direct and more colloquial composers.
But precisely for that reason, we
need to hear him now, and not just him -- we also need to hear Pierre Boulez, Karlheinz
Stockhausen, Györgi Ligeti, Milton Babbitt, and a host of other modernists who for years
made concertgoers grit their teeth. We owe Carnegie Hall a great debt for presenting Mr.
Berio (who was also heard in conversation at Carnegie's Weill Recital Hall the night after
this event). But now we need more. We need a sweeping retrospective, so that -- free at
last from the old insistence that we have to like them -- we can hear the modernists with
innocent ears, and listen to their works simply as music.
Wall Street Journal, November 6, 1997
|